R v Lee BOBROVIZKI [2008] NSWDC 164

R v Lee BOBROVIZKI [2008] NSWDC 164

A period of imprisonment is required to reflect the grave conduct, but due to the offender's young age and reasonable prospects for rehabilitation, the sentence is ordered to be served by way of periodic detention rather than full-time custody.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and sentencing
Legal Topics
['robbery' 'affray' 'sentencing' 'breach of the Peace']
['criminal Law'] ['robbery' 'affray' 'sentencing' 'breach of the Peace']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['appropriate sentence for robbery and affray' 'assessment of objective seriousness' 'extent of remorse and rehabilitation prospects']

Ratio Decidendi

A period of imprisonment is required to reflect the grave conduct, but due to the offender's young age and reasonable prospects for rehabilitation, the sentence is ordered to be served by way of periodic detention rather than full-time custody.

Court Disposition

conviction and sentencing

Orders

  • ['Imprisonment with a non-parole period of twelve months and a head sentence of eighteen months by way of periodic detention.' 'Offender to report to Parramatta Periodic Detention Centre at 8.30am on 28 June 2008.']