Clare v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 484
The primary significance of the heritage item is its presentation to Illoura Avenue and the Stuart Street corner, which will not be adversely affected by the proposed subdivision; a new dwelling on the new lot can be appropriately managed to avoid adverse impact. The subdivision proposal complies with statutory controls, and the section 94 contribution is properly imposed at the subdivision stage.
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert and Sue Clare; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Subdivision, Heritage Significance, Torrens Title, Development Application, Section 94 Contribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert and Sue Clare
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed Torrens Title subdivision adversely impacts heritage significance of listed item
- 2 Whether proposed lots comply with statutory standards
- 3 Appropriate timing for Section 94 contribution
Ratio Decidendi
The primary significance of the heritage item is its presentation to Illoura Avenue and the Stuart Street corner, which will not be adversely affected by the proposed subdivision; a new dwelling on the new lot can be appropriately managed to avoid adverse impact. The subdivision proposal complies with statutory controls, and the section 94 contribution is properly imposed at the subdivision stage.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Application for Torrens Title subdivision of 7-9 Stuart Street, Wahroonga, into two allotments is approved, subject to the conditions in Annexure 'A'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment