Health Care Complaints Commission v Black (No 2) [2015] NSWCATOD 5
The Tribunal found the respondent's conduct in relation to Complaints One to Five—involving repeated improper and unethical behaviour towards female patients, breaches of registration conditions (including chaperone provisions), failure to comply with statutory s34A notices from the HCCC, and failure to notify the National Board of a criminal charge—amounted to both unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct under the National Law and related legislation. The findings relied on the credible and independent evidence of multiple patients, contemporaneous documents, expert evidence, statutory construction, and careful application of the civil standard of proof, as...
- Parties
- Complainant: Health Care Complaints Commission of NSW; Respondent: Robert Anthony John Black
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary (occupational) / Liability Determined for Complaints One to Five; Complaint Six and Penalty/orders Reserved for Stage Two
- Outcome
- Complaints One to Five established; findings of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct under the National Law. Complaint Six reserved for Stage Two. Directions hearing set for further orders.
- Legal Topics
- Osteopath Disciplinary Proceedings, Professional Misconduct, Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct, Chaperone Conditions, Failure to Notify Criminal Charge, Breach of Registration Conditions, Failure to Comply With Statutory Notice, Inadequate Clinical Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health Care Complaints Commission of NSW
Complainant
Robert Anthony John Black
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary (occupational) / Liability Determined for Complaints One to Five; Complaint Six and Penalty/orders Reserved for Stage Two
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct as defined by the National Law
- 2 Whether the respondent breached registration conditions imposed by the Osteopathy Council
- 3 Whether the respondent failed to comply with s34A notices under the Health Care Complaints Act 1993
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the respondent's conduct in relation to Complaints One to Five—involving repeated improper and unethical behaviour towards female patients, breaches of registration conditions (including chaperone provisions), failure to comply with statutory s34A notices from the HCCC, and failure to notify the National Board of a criminal charge—amounted to both unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct under the National Law and related legislation. The findings relied on the credible and independent evidence of multiple patients, contemporaneous documents, expert evidence, statutory construction, and careful application of the civil standard of proof, as...
Court Disposition
Complaints One to Five established; findings of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct under the National Law. Complaint Six reserved for Stage Two. Directions hearing set for further orders.
Orders
- Directions Hearing listed for 9.30 am on 17 February 2015 regarding Stage Two of proceedings (including Complaint Six and orders).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment