Bateman v Central Coast Council [2019] NSWLEC 1101
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for leave to amend the development application and for development consent to be granted subject to conditions. The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make because the identified jurisdictional pre-requisites were met: the proposed centre based child care facility was permissible in the R2 Low Density Residential zone and no contamination report was required under cl 7 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the agreed decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; leave granted to amend the development application; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'child Care Centre' 'development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'contaminated Land' 'permissible Use']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether the amended development application for a centre based child care facility satisfied the jurisdictional pre-requisites to the grant of development consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for leave to amend the development application and for development consent to be granted subject to conditions. The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make because the identified jurisdictional pre-requisites were met: the proposed centre based child care facility was permissible in the R2 Low Density Residential zone and no contamination report was required under cl 7 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land. The proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with the agreed decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; leave granted to amend the development application; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to amend their development application in accordance with the plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure "B".' 'The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. DA51671/2017 for a child care centre to accommodate 80 children with basement car parking is approved subject to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment