Brannigan v Coban [2013] NSWLEC 1025
The court found that the hedge of nine Leighton Green Cypress trees severely obstructed the applicant's view, that the obstruction outweighed any reason not to interfere, and that pruning the trees to a specified height would appropriately balance the applicant's view and the respondents' privacy, in accordance with the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'obstruction of Views' 'pruning Orders' 'neighbour Relations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hedge of nine Leighton Green Cypress trees severely obstructs the applicant's view under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006" 'Whether the trees should be pruned or otherwise managed to remedy the view obstruction']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the hedge of nine Leighton Green Cypress trees severely obstructed the applicant's view, that the obstruction outweighed any reason not to interfere, and that pruning the trees to a specified height would appropriately balance the applicant's view and the respondents' privacy, in accordance with the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part.
Orders
- ['Within 60 days, respondents to engage a qualified arborist or horticulturist to prune the hedge of nine Leighton Green Cypress trees to a height no greater than 5.5 metres above ground level at the base of each tree.' "Respondents to give applicant two days' notice of the works." 'Applicant to allow all access...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment