Brown v Forestry Tasmania [2005] FCA 1210
Tasmania is a party to an agreement with the Commonwealth, whose status is material to the proceeding, and as the Commonwealth has been granted leave to intervene on certain issues, it is appropriate that Tasmania also be granted limited leave to intervene to protect its interests, subject to conditions regarding scope and procedure.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Intervene
- Outcome
- Intervention granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['intervention' 'leave to Intervene' 'rule Dispensations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Intervene
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the State of Tasmania should be granted leave to intervene in the proceeding' "Scope and limits of State of Tasmania's intervention"]
Ratio Decidendi
Tasmania is a party to an agreement with the Commonwealth, whose status is material to the proceeding, and as the Commonwealth has been granted leave to intervene on certain issues, it is appropriate that Tasmania also be granted limited leave to intervene to protect its interests, subject to conditions regarding scope and procedure.
Court Disposition
Intervention granted with conditions
Orders
- ['The State of Tasmania be granted leave to intervene in the proceeding (both orally and in writing as is convenient to the Court) pursuant to Order 6 rule 17 of the Rules of Court.' 'Order 6 rule 17(4) of the Rules of Court be dispensed with so that, upon obtaining appropriate leave, the State of Tasmania may...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment