Regina v Robert Charles VEEN [2000] NSWSC 656

Regina v Robert Charles VEEN [2000] NSWSC 656

The applicant should have his sentence of life imprisonment re-determined by setting a minimum term of 20 years (commencing 9 November 1983), followed by an additional term for the balance of his natural life. This accommodates appropriate recognition of time served, demonstrated progress, and the importance of both rehabilitation opportunity and public safety. The history, expert evidence, statutory safeguards, and continuing risks together justify the need for ongoing supervision beyond the minimum term.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Robert Charles Veen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Redetermination of Life Sentence (s 13 a Sentencing Act 1989)
Outcome
Application granted. Sentence re-determined.
Legal Topics
Redetermination of Life Sentences, Parole Eligibility, Dangerous Offenders, Protection of the Community, Rehabilitation
Criminal Law Sentencing Redetermination of Life Sentences Parole Eligibility Dangerous Offenders Protection of the Community Rehabilitation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Robert Charles Veen

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Redetermination of Life Sentence (s 13 a Sentencing Act 1989)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Robert Charles Veen should have his life sentence re-determined under s 13A of the Sentencing Act 1989
  2. 2 What minimum term (if any) and additional term should be set, having regard to the evidence and relevant law

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant should have his sentence of life imprisonment re-determined by setting a minimum term of 20 years (commencing 9 November 1983), followed by an additional term for the balance of his natural life. This accommodates appropriate recognition of time served, demonstrated progress, and the importance of both rehabilitation opportunity and public safety. The history, expert evidence, statutory safeguards, and continuing risks together justify the need for ongoing supervision beyond the minimum term.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Sentence re-determined.

Orders

  • The sentence of life imprisonment passed on 17 December 1985 is re-determined to imprisonment for a minimum term of 20 years (commencing 9 November 1983 and expiring 8 November 2003), with an additional term to commence 9 November 2003 and continue for the balance of Robert Charles Veen’s natural life.
  • Exhibits may be returned.