AUGHTON v WILKIE [2010] NSWSC 1462

AUGHTON v WILKIE [2010] NSWSC 1462

False representations regarding ownership and encumbrance were made to the plaintiff, causing him to invest $280,000; plaintiff relied upon these representations and suffered loss, entitling him to recover damages under s 42 of the Fair Trading Act.

Parties
Plaintiff: Robert David Aughton; Defendant: Brent Alan Wilkie
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; cross-claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Trusts, Equitable Charge, Damages
Equity Consumer Protection Misleading and Deceptive Conduct Trusts Equitable Charge Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert David Aughton

Plaintiff

Brent Alan Wilkie

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether representations were made as to ownership and encumbrance of land
  2. 2 Whether representations were false or misleading
  3. 3 Whether reliance and causation existed

Ratio Decidendi

False representations regarding ownership and encumbrance were made to the plaintiff, causing him to invest $280,000; plaintiff relied upon these representations and suffered loss, entitling him to recover damages under s 42 of the Fair Trading Act.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; cross-claim dismissed

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $280,000
  • Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs