Kidd v R [2009] NSWCCA 229
The sentencing judge expressly considered the Queensland sentences, totality, the applicant's age and health, and custodial conditions, and structured the New South Wales sentences with concurrency and a reduced effective non-parole period. The applicant did not demonstrate that the sentencing discretion miscarried or that any asserted errors concerning totality, sentence ratio, commencement date, age or custodial conditions warranted appellate intervention.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal; Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['severity of Sentence' 'totality' 'interstate Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'advanced Age of Offender' 'conditions of Detention' 'delay']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal; Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an extension of time should be granted to file the notice of appeal.' 'Whether the total effective sentence was unduly harsh or severe.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying the principle of totality, including by reference to the Queensland sentences.' "Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to make sufficient allowance for the applicant's advanced age." 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to take sufficient account of custodial conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge expressly considered the Queensland sentences, totality, the applicant's age and health, and custodial conditions, and structured the New South Wales sentences with concurrency and a reduced effective non-parole period. The applicant did not demonstrate that the sentencing discretion miscarried or that any asserted errors concerning totality, sentence ratio, commencement date, age or custodial conditions warranted appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Extension of time granted.' 'Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment