McIlveen v Baiada Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 174
The poultry killing and processing operation is limited to the number or quantity killed and processed as at 3 February 1986, being 91,350 live kilograms per week and between 34 and 40 employees. Enlargement or intensification of use after that date is not authorised without consent. Ancillary activities covered by subsequent consents are not limited except where conditions apply, specifically in relation to facility extensions post-1998. Relief is subject to the Court's discretion, and further hearing is required on evidence and submissions regarding orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment Liability and Further Hearing on Relief
- Outcome
- Entitlement to declaratory and injunctive relief in respect of limits on core poultry killing and processing operation, with matter referred to Registrar for hearing on evidence and submissions regarding exercise of discretion.
- Legal Topics
- ['existing Use Rights' 'development Consents' 'intensification of Use' 'environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'tamworth Local Environmental Plan' 'planning Controls']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment Liability and Further Hearing on Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Baiada Poultry Pty Limited is carrying on development without development consent' 'Whether Baiada Poultry Pty Limited is entitled to use its premises to kill, process or package more than nine thousand birds per day' 'Extent and limitations of existing use rights under relevant legislation' 'Lawfulness of intensification of use after 3 February 1986']
Ratio Decidendi
The poultry killing and processing operation is limited to the number or quantity killed and processed as at 3 February 1986, being 91,350 live kilograms per week and between 34 and 40 employees. Enlargement or intensification of use after that date is not authorised without consent. Ancillary activities covered by subsequent consents are not limited except where conditions apply, specifically in relation to facility extensions post-1998. Relief is subject to the Court's discretion, and further hearing is required on evidence and submissions regarding orders.
Court Disposition
Entitlement to declaratory and injunctive relief in respect of limits on core poultry killing and processing operation, with matter referred to Registrar for hearing on evidence and submissions regarding exercise of discretion.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment