Dunn, in the matter of Dunn v Vangsnes [2000] FCA 1209
The petition was dismissed because the respondent, at the last minute, established solvency by cashing the superannuation cheque. The applicant was awarded costs since the petition was properly presented and dismissed only because of the late change in circumstances regarding the respondent's accessible assets.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Order After Hearing
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed; respondent ordered to pay applicant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['sequestration Order' 'bankruptcy Petition Dismissal' 'costs in Bankruptcy Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Order After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sequestration order should be made' 'Entitlement to costs following dismissal of the bankruptcy petition']
Ratio Decidendi
The petition was dismissed because the respondent, at the last minute, established solvency by cashing the superannuation cheque. The applicant was awarded costs since the petition was properly presented and dismissed only because of the late change in circumstances regarding the respondent's accessible assets.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed; respondent ordered to pay applicant's costs.
Orders
- ['The petition be dismissed.' "The respondent pay the applicant's costs of, and incidental to, the petition including any reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment