Shepherd, R.E. v. Griffiths, I.M. & Anor [1985] FCA 555
The circumstances—that the applicant acted on behalf of the community, that the second-named respondent did not invoke the civil jurisdiction, and that the submissions made were not unreasonable—militate against awarding costs against the accused; therefore, there shall be no order as to costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Edmund Shepherd; First Respondent: Ian Michael Griffiths; Second Respondent: Lois Norma Jones
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Order of Review / Costs Determination Following Judgment
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Committal Proceedings, Costs Discretion, Construction of Statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Edmund Shepherd
Applicant
Ian Michael Griffiths
First Respondent
Lois Norma Jones
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order of Review / Costs Determination Following Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be awarded costs against the second-named respondent in judicial review proceedings arising out of committal proceedings
- 2 What considerations guide the exercise of the discretion to award costs in this context
Ratio Decidendi
The circumstances—that the applicant acted on behalf of the community, that the second-named respondent did not invoke the civil jurisdiction, and that the submissions made were not unreasonable—militate against awarding costs against the accused; therefore, there shall be no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- There will be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment