R v Agius; R v Castagna (No 14) [2018] NSWSC 1248

R v Agius; R v Castagna (No 14) [2018] NSWSC 1248

Both offenders engaged in a long-term, sophisticated conspiracy to deprive the Commonwealth of substantial tax revenue and launder the proceeds under the guise of sham loans. The seriousness, duration, sophistication, and scale of the offending required substantial sentences of imprisonment, having regard to the need for general deterrence, punishment, and the objective gravity of the conduct. Mitigating factors, subjective circumstances, and delay were considered, but not sufficient to justify any sentence other than full-time custody.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Defendant: Robert Francis Agius; Defendant: Anthony Dante Castagna
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Defraud the Commonwealth, False Declaration of Income, Dealing With Proceeds of Crime, Sentencing, Tax Fraud, Money Laundering
Criminal Law Conspiracy to Defraud the Commonwealth False Declaration of Income Dealing With Proceeds of Crime Sentencing Tax Fraud Money Laundering

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 31 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Robert Francis Agius

Defendant

Anthony Dante Castagna

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the offenders conspired to defraud the Commonwealth by concealing income and underpaying tax
  2. 2 Whether the offenders conspired to deal with proceeds of crime over $1 million
  3. 3 Appropriate sentencing having regard to deterrence, punishment, and mitigating/aggravating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Both offenders engaged in a long-term, sophisticated conspiracy to deprive the Commonwealth of substantial tax revenue and launder the proceeds under the guise of sham loans. The seriousness, duration, sophistication, and scale of the offending required substantial sentences of imprisonment, having regard to the need for general deterrence, punishment, and the objective gravity of the conduct. Mitigating factors, subjective circumstances, and delay were considered, but not sufficient to justify any sentence other than full-time custody.

Court Disposition

Convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment

Orders

  • Robert Agius: Convicted of counts 1, 2 and 13. For count 1: 2 years 3 months imprisonment (31 March 2017 - 30 June 2019). For count 2: 4 years 3 months imprisonment (1 July 2019 - 30 September 2023). For count 13: 4 years 3 months imprisonment (1 July 2020 - 30 September 2024). Total effective sentence: 7 years 6...
  • Anthony Castagna: Convicted of counts 1, 2 and 13. For count 1: 2 years imprisonment (18 April 2018 - 17 April 2020). For count 2: 3 years 6 months (18 April 2020 - 17 October 2023). For count 13: 4 years (18 April 2021 - 17 April 2025). Total effective sentence: 7 years (18 April 2018 - 17 April 2025). Non-parole...