Brown v Zomba Music Publishers Australia Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1214

Brown v Zomba Music Publishers Australia Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1214

Grounds for summary dismissal asserted by the first defendant are precluded by s 459S of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as they could have been argued in an application to set aside the statutory demand. Therefore, the application for summary dismissal must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Plaintiff: Robert Geoffrey Brown alias Robert John Mutt Lange alias Maurice John Howe; First Defendant: Zomba Music Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 089 247 138); Second Defendant: Zomba Music Holdings B.V. Hoe Floo 24 1251 Eb Laren The Netherlands; Third Defendant: Mary Theofelos alias Eilleen Regina Edwards alias Shania Twain
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 October 2003
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up Application / Application for Summary Dismissal of Winding Up Application
Outcome
Application for summary dismissal dismissed; proceeding adjourned; title of proceeding amended to remove second and third defendants.
Legal Topics
Winding Up on Insolvency, Statutory Demand, Summary Dismissal, Abuse of Process
Corporations Law Winding Up on Insolvency Statutory Demand Summary Dismissal Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Geoffrey Brown alias Robert John Mutt Lange alias Maurice John Howe

Plaintiff

Zomba Music Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 089 247 138)

First Defendant

Zomba Music Holdings B.V. Hoe Floo 24 1251 Eb Laren The Netherlands

Second Defendant

Mary Theofelos alias Eilleen Regina Edwards alias Shania Twain

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Corporations Winding Up Application / Application for Summary Dismissal of Winding Up Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for winding up fell outside the period required for the presumption of insolvency under s 459C(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether the application for winding up is an abuse of process and should be summarily dismissed
  3. 3 Whether s 459S of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) precludes opposition grounds that could have been raised in an application to set aside a statutory demand

Ratio Decidendi

Grounds for summary dismissal asserted by the first defendant are precluded by s 459S of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as they could have been argued in an application to set aside the statutory demand. Therefore, the application for summary dismissal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for summary dismissal dismissed; proceeding adjourned; title of proceeding amended to remove second and third defendants.

Orders

  • The application on behalf of the first named defendant for summary dismissal of the application for winding up be dismissed.
  • The application be adjourned for further directions on 3 December 2003 at 10.30 am.