Harrison & anor v Neuer & anor [2015] NSWLEC 1098
On the evidence, including the observed line of survey pegs, the surveyor's material and the Commissioner's observations, the Court was not satisfied that the Tallowwood was wholly or principally on the respondents' adjoining land. The tree was therefore not a tree to which the Trees Act applied, and the Court had no jurisdiction to consider the remaining elements of the applicants' claim.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Tree Dispute Application / Principal Judgment After on Site Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdictional Threshold' 'tree Situated Wholly or Principally on Adjoining Land' 'damage to Property' 'potential Injury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Tree Dispute Application / Principal Judgment After on Site Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the tree the subject of the application was wholly or principally situated on the respondents' adjoining land so as to be a tree to which the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act applies." 'Whether the Court had jurisdiction to make orders to remedy, restrain or prevent damage to property or prevent injury as a consequence of the tree.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, including the observed line of survey pegs, the surveyor's material and the Commissioner's observations, the Court was not satisfied that the Tallowwood was wholly or principally on the respondents' adjoining land. The tree was therefore not a tree to which the Trees Act applied, and the Court had no jurisdiction to consider the remaining elements of the applicants' claim.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment