Robert Ian Mitchelson v Carolyn Eva Mitchelson [1979] FCA 48
The applicant had no reasonable prospect of success on the proposed new ground of appeal because the stapling of the deed was not a material alteration affecting legal obligations, was done by Titles Office staff to facilitate registration, and did not void the mortgage. Further, the alleged damage from caveats was suffered before any alleged alteration and the lodging of the caveats was proper.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application to Add New Ground of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application to amend notice of appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Grounds of Appeal' 'material Alteration of Deed' 'mortgage Registration' 'lodgement of Caveats' 'counter Claim Under Bankruptcy Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application to Add New Ground of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the notice of appeal to include a new ground based on fresh evidence' 'Whether the stapling of the deed of settlement to the mortgage rendered the mortgage void due to material alteration' 'Whether the respondent wrongfully lodged caveats and whether any damage flowed from this']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant had no reasonable prospect of success on the proposed new ground of appeal because the stapling of the deed was not a material alteration affecting legal obligations, was done by Titles Office staff to facilitate registration, and did not void the mortgage. Further, the alleged damage from caveats was suffered before any alleged alteration and the lodging of the caveats was proper.
Court Disposition
Application to amend notice of appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The summons be dismissed.' 'The costs of the summons be paid by the appellant.' 'All reserved costs of this action be paid by the appellant.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment