Jennings v Petrucci [2014] NSWCATAP 31
The Appeal Panel was not satisfied that the appellant may have suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice as required by the legislation. The evidence showed persistent failure to pay rent, financial hardship to the respondent, execution of the warrant for possession, and no substantial new evidence was provided by the appellant. Therefore, leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert Jennings; Respondent: Paul Petrucci
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Leave to Appeal, Residential Tenancy, Substantial Miscarriage of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Jennings
Appellant
Paul Petrucci
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against Tribunal orders terminating tenancy and ordering possession and unpaid rent
- 2 Whether a substantial miscarriage of justice occurred
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel was not satisfied that the appellant may have suffered a substantial miscarriage of justice as required by the legislation. The evidence showed persistent failure to pay rent, financial hardship to the respondent, execution of the warrant for possession, and no substantial new evidence was provided by the appellant. Therefore, leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is refused.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment