R v BURGESS [2001] NSWCCA 42
The appeal against conviction failed because the identification evidence was sufficiently reliable, the jury was properly directed, and any inconsistencies in evidence did not give rise to reasonable doubt. The appeal against sentence was dismissed because the sentences were justified and not manifestly excessive given the offender’s record, seriousness of offences and prior failures of non-custodial measures.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'identification Evidence' 'sentencing Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdicts of guilty are unsafe and unsatisfactory' 'Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal against conviction failed because the identification evidence was sufficiently reliable, the jury was properly directed, and any inconsistencies in evidence did not give rise to reasonable doubt. The appeal against sentence was dismissed because the sentences were justified and not manifestly excessive given the offender’s record, seriousness of offences and prior failures of non-custodial measures.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed' 'Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment