R v BURGESS [2001] NSWCCA 42

R v BURGESS [2001] NSWCCA 42

The appeal against conviction failed because the identification evidence was sufficiently reliable, the jury was properly directed, and any inconsistencies in evidence did not give rise to reasonable doubt. The appeal against sentence was dismissed because the sentences were justified and not manifestly excessive given the offender’s record, seriousness of offences and prior failures of non-custodial measures.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Conviction' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'identification Evidence' 'sentencing Principles']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the verdicts of guilty are unsafe and unsatisfactory' 'Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal against conviction failed because the identification evidence was sufficiently reliable, the jury was properly directed, and any inconsistencies in evidence did not give rise to reasonable doubt. The appeal against sentence was dismissed because the sentences were justified and not manifestly excessive given the offender’s record, seriousness of offences and prior failures of non-custodial measures.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Appeal against conviction dismissed' 'Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']