R v Grant [2002] NSWCCA 243
The Court held that the trial judge misdirected the jury by instructing that intoxication was irrelevant to murder based on reckless indifference to human life; under Part 11A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), murder in all forms, including reckless indifference, is an offence of specific intent for which evidence of intoxication may be taken into account. The conviction for murder was thus quashed and a new trial ordered. The conviction for shooting with intent to murder was sustained as supported by the evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against murder conviction allowed; conviction and sentence for murder quashed and new trial ordered. Appeal against conviction and sentence for shooting with intent to murder dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'intoxication' 'jury Directions' 'reckless Indifference' 'shooting With Intent to Murder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in directing the jury that intoxication was irrelevant to murder where based on reckless indifference to human life' 'Whether the verdict on the count of shooting with intent to murder was unreasonable or unsupported by evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the trial judge misdirected the jury by instructing that intoxication was irrelevant to murder based on reckless indifference to human life; under Part 11A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), murder in all forms, including reckless indifference, is an offence of specific intent for which evidence of intoxication may be taken into account. The conviction for murder was thus quashed and a new trial ordered. The conviction for shooting with intent to murder was sustained as supported by the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal against murder conviction allowed; conviction and sentence for murder quashed and new trial ordered. Appeal against conviction and sentence for shooting with intent to murder dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal against conviction in respect of Count 1 be allowed' 'Conviction and sentence for Count 1 be quashed' 'A new trial be directed in relation to Count 1' 'The appeal against conviction and sentence in respect of Count 2 be dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment