Turnbull v Strange [2018] NSWCA 157
The appeal was dismissed because disclosure or production required by the subpoena was within the exemption in s 23(5)(c) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW), that exemption was not confined to law enforcement or public revenue purposes, and s 23(6) did not preserve the prohibition in s 18 or negate the operation of s 23(5)(c). Further, the Act did not affect the Court's judicial function in issuing subpoenas or controlling access to subpoenaed material.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Concerning Subpoena and Access to Subpoenaed Material / Court of Appeal From Interlocutory Decision of Lindsay J in the Supreme Court, Equity Division
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['subpoenas' 'disclosure of Personal Information by Public Sector Agency' 'privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (nsw)' 'judicial Functions of Courts' 'application to Set Aside Subpoena']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Concerning Subpoena and Access to Subpoenaed Material / Court of Appeal From Interlocutory Decision of Lindsay J in the Supreme Court, Equity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subpoena should be set aside on the basis that it required Corrective Services NSW to disclose personal information in breach of s 18 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW).' 'Whether the exemption in s 23(5)(c) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) is limited to disclosure authorised or required by subpoena for law enforcement purposes or protection of the public revenue.' 'Whether s 23(6) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) constrained the exemption in s 23(5)(c).' 'Whether access to material produced under subpoena should be refused to any person.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because disclosure or production required by the subpoena was within the exemption in s 23(5)(c) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW), that exemption was not confined to law enforcement or public revenue purposes, and s 23(6) did not preserve the prohibition in s 18 or negate the operation of s 23(5)(c). Further, the Act did not affect the Court's judicial function in issuing subpoenas or controlling access to subpoenaed material.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Grant the applicants leave to appeal.' 'Direct the applicants to file within seven days the draft notice of appeal contained in the White Folder.' 'Dismiss the appeal.' "Order that the applicants pay the respondent's costs in this Court."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment