Constable v Anvic Holdings P/L & Ors [2001] NSWSC 444

Constable v Anvic Holdings P/L & Ors [2001] NSWSC 444

The orders made on 15 December 2000 were set aside because the delegate exceeded the statutory function under s 63 by making final determinations on questions of law in an application for rehearing, and because orders affecting the rights of the plaintiff and second defendant were made without notice or an opportunity to be heard. Any stay remaining on foot was also set aside because the procedural provisions applicable to the grant of a stay and an extension of time were not observed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Proceeding Seeking to Set Aside Orders of the Fair Trading Tribunal / Judgment on Summons Filed 25 January 2001
Outcome
Orders made by Senior Member Gallagher on 15 December 2000 set aside; any stay remaining on foot set aside; first defendant ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Legal Topics
['application for Rehearing' 'stay' 'extension of Time' 'natural Justice' 'fair Trading Tribunal Procedure' 'section 63 of the Fair Trading Tribunal Act 1998']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Law Proceeding Seeking to Set Aside Orders of the Fair Trading Tribunal / Judgment on Summons Filed 25 January 2001

  1. 1 ['Whether orders made by the Fair Trading Tribunal on 3 October 2000 and 15 December 2000 should be set aside.' 'Whether s 63 of the Fair Trading Tribunal Act 1998 permitted the Chairperson or delegate to grant a rehearing on the basis of legal error.' 'Whether the Chairperson or delegate was required to observe procedural fairness when dealing with an application for rehearing.' 'Whether procedural requirements applied to the grant of a stay and an extension of time.']

Ratio Decidendi

The orders made on 15 December 2000 were set aside because the delegate exceeded the statutory function under s 63 by making final determinations on questions of law in an application for rehearing, and because orders affecting the rights of the plaintiff and second defendant were made without notice or an opportunity to be heard. Any stay remaining on foot was also set aside because the procedural provisions applicable to the grant of a stay and an extension of time were not observed.

Court Disposition

Orders made by Senior Member Gallagher on 15 December 2000 set aside; any stay remaining on foot set aside; first defendant ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Orders

  • ['The orders made by Senior Member Gallagher on 15 December 2000 are set aside.' 'If any stay remains on foot, it is set aside.' 'The first defendant is to pay the costs of the proceedings.']