Hudson, Robert (Junior) v Donald, Thomas James & Anor [1998] FCA 227

Hudson, Robert (Junior) v Donald, Thomas James & Anor [1998] FCA 227

No error in the reasons for judgment dismissing the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice was identified, and there was no reason for the appellate court to intervene.

Parties
Appellant: Robert (Junior) Hudson; Respondents: Thomas James Donald and Another
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 1998
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Bankruptcy Notice, Appeal From Dismissal
Bankruptcy Setting Aside Bankruptcy Notice Appeal From Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert (Junior) Hudson

Appellant

Thomas James Donald and Another

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an error existed in the reasons for judgment of Lindgren J in dismissing the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice
  2. 2 Whether the Court should go behind the magistrate's judgment supporting the bankruptcy notice

Ratio Decidendi

No error in the reasons for judgment dismissing the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice was identified, and there was no reason for the appellate court to intervene.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed