Robert McIntosh v Recoil Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 81

Robert McIntosh v Recoil Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 81

The respondent breached section 170DC of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 by failing to provide procedural fairness as the applicant was not warned his job was in jeopardy, and not provided opportunity to defend against allegations central to termination, rendering the termination harsh and unjust under section 170DE(2). Compensation rather than reinstatement was appropriate given the valid reasons for termination apart from procedural breach.

Parties
Applicant: Robert McIntosh; Respondent: Recoil Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed in part. Compensation awarded. Reinstatement refused.
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, Procedural Fairness, Reinstatement, Compensation
Industrial Law Termination of Employment Procedural Fairness Reinstatement Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert McIntosh

Applicant

Recoil Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Law Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the applicant's termination in breach of section 170DC of the Industrial Relations Act 1988?
  2. 2 Was the termination harsh, unjust or unreasonable under section 170DE of the Act?
  3. 3 Should the applicant be reinstated or compensated?

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent breached section 170DC of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 by failing to provide procedural fairness as the applicant was not warned his job was in jeopardy, and not provided opportunity to defend against allegations central to termination, rendering the termination harsh and unjust under section 170DE(2). Compensation rather than reinstatement was appropriate given the valid reasons for termination apart from procedural breach.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part. Compensation awarded. Reinstatement refused.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay the sum of $20,000 in compensation to the applicant, within 21 days of 10 March 1995.