Symond v McNeice [2011] NSWDC 87

Symond v McNeice [2011] NSWDC 87

The applicant failed to provide an adequate explanation for delay and did not advance any evidence supporting an arguable defence, as the contract was neither varied nor frustrated. Application to set aside default judgment was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment / Application Dismissed
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
['default Judgment' 'motion to Set Aside' 'loan Agreement' 'delay Explanation' 'arguable Defence']
['civil Procedure' 'contract Law'] ['default Judgment' 'motion to Set Aside' 'loan Agreement' 'delay Explanation' 'arguable Defence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment / Application Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Was there an adequate explanation for the delay in applying to set aside default judgment?' 'Did the applicant have an arguable defence to the claim for repayment of the loan?' 'Was the contract varied or frustrated?']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide an adequate explanation for delay and did not advance any evidence supporting an arguable defence, as the contract was neither varied nor frustrated. Application to set aside default judgment was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • []