Mumu v Northern Territory of Australia [2023] FCA 288
The court is satisfied that the requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) have been met, including the authorisation of the application, agreement on terms, and assessment by the Northern Territory of Australia of the factual basis for native title. It is appropriate to recognise the existence of native title in the Determination Area, held by the native title holders as specified, and to make the orders sought without a trial. The Iyangka Kularta Aboriginal Corporation is determined as the prescribed body corporate. The determination recognises long-held native title, not its creation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Application / Judgment and Orders on Consent Determination
- Outcome
- Determination of native title by consent; orders made as per parties’ agreement.
- Legal Topics
- ['consent Determination' 'requirements of S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)' 'recognition of Native Title Holders' 'non Exclusive Native Title Rights' 'prescribed Body Corporate Nomination' 'relationship With Other Interests']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Judgment and Orders on Consent Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) are satisfied for a consent determination.' 'Whether it is appropriate for the court to make the orders sought pursuant to s 87 and s 94A of the NTA.' 'Whether the application is validly authorised and within the court’s power to determine.']
Ratio Decidendi
The court is satisfied that the requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) have been met, including the authorisation of the application, agreement on terms, and assessment by the Northern Territory of Australia of the factual basis for native title. It is appropriate to recognise the existence of native title in the Determination Area, held by the native title holders as specified, and to make the orders sought without a trial. The Iyangka Kularta Aboriginal Corporation is determined as the prescribed body corporate. The determination recognises long-held native title, not its creation.
Court Disposition
Determination of native title by consent; orders made as per parties’ agreement.
Orders
- ['There be a determination of native title in the terms of the Determination set out at Attachment A.' 'Native title is not to be held on trust.' 'Iyangka Kularta Aboriginal Corporation (ICN: 9136) to be the prescribed body corporate for purposes of s 57(2) and perform functions in s 57(3) of the NTA after...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment