Palmieri v Think Creative & Print Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATAP 272
The Appeal Panel held that no signature was required because the contract was partly oral and partly in writing, the quotations did not make signature mandatory, and the appellant's payment of invoices and instructions during performance evidenced acceptance of the respondent's written proposals. The no evidence ground failed because the respondent's bundle contained some evidence of work done and services delivered. Leave to appeal was refused because the available evidence, including communications and materials showing work performed and the website ready to go live, did not show that the Tribunal's conclusions were unfair, inequitable or against the weight of evidence, and the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Consumer and Commercial Division Proceedings Under the Fair Trading Act 1987 (nsw) Concerning Website and Online Media Services / Appeal Panel Determination of Leave to Appeal and Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['formation of Contract' 'acceptance by Conduct' 'contract Terms' 'breach of Contract' 'australian Consumer Law (nsw) Consumer Guarantees' 'leave to Appeal' 'no Evidence Ground']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Consumer and Commercial Division Proceedings Under the Fair Trading Act 1987 (nsw) Concerning Website and Online Media Services / Appeal Panel Determination of Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a signature was required to form a contract on the written terms provided by the respondent.' 'Whether there was no evidence to support the conclusion that the respondent performed its obligations and completed a website in accordance with the contract.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted for challenges to findings about completion of work, social media posts, approval of the website, passwords and fitness for purpose under the Australian Consumer Law (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel held that no signature was required because the contract was partly oral and partly in writing, the quotations did not make signature mandatory, and the appellant's payment of invoices and instructions during performance evidenced acceptance of the respondent's written proposals. The no evidence ground failed because the respondent's bundle contained some evidence of work done and services delivered. Leave to appeal was refused because the available evidence, including communications and materials showing work performed and the website ready to go live, did not show that the Tribunal's conclusions were unfair, inequitable or against the weight of evidence, and the...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment