Rathswohl v Court (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 505
Costs should not be capped as there was no evidence of excessiveness; plaintiff's provision and costs are appropriate given circumstances and the offer of compromise regime. Defendant's request to preserve net estate would defeat purpose of statutory compromise regime.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Robert Rathswohl; Defendant: Yvette Court
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision / Final Orders
- Outcome
- Provision made for plaintiff; costs (including indemnity costs) and interest awarded; orders as per plaintiff's proposed short minutes.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Offer of Compromise, Provision From Estate, Interest, Cost Capping
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Rathswohl
Plaintiff
Yvette Court
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Provision / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's costs should be capped to preserve net estate for the defendant
- 2 Entitlement to costs (including indemnity costs) following non-acceptance of offer of compromise
- 3 Calculation of provision from estate
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should not be capped as there was no evidence of excessiveness; plaintiff's provision and costs are appropriate given circumstances and the offer of compromise regime. Defendant's request to preserve net estate would defeat purpose of statutory compromise regime.
Court Disposition
Provision made for plaintiff; costs (including indemnity costs) and interest awarded; orders as per plaintiff's proposed short minutes.
Orders
- Plaintiff to receive lump sum of $500,000 in lieu of will provision.
- Interest as for a legacy under Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) to run on unpaid balance after 3 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment