Robert Ristevski v IMV Plastics Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 708

On the balance of probabilities, the applicant was found to be a casual employee engaged for a short period and thus excluded from the Court's jurisdiction under section 170CC and regulation 30B.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 30 November 1995
Procedural Posture: Industrial Relations Termination of Employment / Judgment
Outcome: Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics: ['termination of Employment' 'jurisdiction' 'casual Employment']

['industrial Law'] ['termination of Employment' 'jurisdiction' 'casual Employment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Industrial Relations Termination of Employment / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the applicant was dismissed from a permanent position without notice and for a prohibited reason under section 170DF' 'Whether the applicant was a casual employee and thus excluded from jurisdiction under section 170CC and regulation 30B']

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, the applicant was found to be a casual employee engaged for a short period and thus excluded from the Court's jurisdiction under section 170CC and regulation 30B.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

['The application be dismissed.']