Seymour v Grace [2019] NSWLEC 1276
The Court found that the Liquidambar's roots caused displacement of the paving and damaged the fence near the boundary, and that costs for full boundary fence replacement should be shared, while apportioning 20% responsibility for paving repairs to the respondent on limited evidence of causation. The removal of the trees obviated the need for a preventative order. Orders reflected these findings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted with modified orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['damage by Trees' 'boundary Fences' 'compensation for Damage']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's trees caused damage to the applicant's property, including paving and fence" 'Whether compensation and orders for removal/repair should be made' 'How costs of fence and paving repairs should be apportioned']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Liquidambar's roots caused displacement of the paving and damaged the fence near the boundary, and that costs for full boundary fence replacement should be shared, while apportioning 20% responsibility for paving repairs to the respondent on limited evidence of causation. The removal of the trees obviated the need for a preventative order. Orders reflected these findings.
Court Disposition
Application granted with modified orders.
Orders
- ['Within 30 days, both parties to obtain two quotes for replacement of the common boundary fence as specified.' 'Within 90 days, applicant to engage contractor providing the lowest or otherwise agreed quote to replace the fence.' 'Within 120 days, respondent to pay applicant 50% of the quoted fencing costs upon...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment