Tobin v Ezekiel; Estate of Lily Ezekiel [2009] NSWSC 1313
The applicant does not hold a caveatable interest; a right to share in the surplus of a deceased estate or to be paid mediation costs is insufficient to support a caveat over estate land. Leave to intervene and to charge mediation costs on the estate property is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Robert Stephen Angyal; First Plaintiff: Evelyn Tobin; Second Plaintiff: Clara Ezekiel; First Defendant: Morris Ezekiel; Second Defendant: Albert Ezekiel
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Probate Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Application for Caveat and Costs
- Outcome
- Applicant's claim for caveatable interest dismissed. Applicant to pay defendants' costs of today, excluding costs of retaining Senior Counsel.
- Legal Topics
- Caveatable Interest, Surplus of Deceased Estate, Costs of Mediation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Stephen Angyal
Applicant
Evelyn Tobin
First Plaintiff
Clara Ezekiel
Second Plaintiff
Morris Ezekiel
First Defendant
Albert Ezekiel
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application in Probate Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Application for Caveat and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has a caveatable interest in estate land
- 2 Whether the costs of mediation can be charged on estate property
- 3 Whether leave to intervene should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant does not hold a caveatable interest; a right to share in the surplus of a deceased estate or to be paid mediation costs is insufficient to support a caveat over estate land. Leave to intervene and to charge mediation costs on the estate property is refused.
Court Disposition
Applicant's claim for caveatable interest dismissed. Applicant to pay defendants' costs of today, excluding costs of retaining Senior Counsel.
Orders
- Refused leave to intervene in proceedings.
- Refused to make orders proposed in the applicant's Draft Notice of Motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment