Robert Symes and Kim Louise Filmer v Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATCD 229
The Tribunal found that Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd breached contract and statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989. The owners were entitled to recover damages for rectification of defects in the pergola, internal trims, and water storage tanks according to preferred rectification methodologies, including appropriate allowances for preliminaries, overheads, profit and GST. Less costly repair options offered by the builder were rejected as insufficient to restore contractual conformity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Building Claim / Final Determination
- Outcome
- judgment for applicants
- Legal Topics
- ['breach of Contract' 'statutory Warranties' 'assessment of Damages' 'rectification Methodology' 'mitigation' 'work Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Building Claim / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the builder breached the contract and statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989' 'Appropriate rectification methodology for defects—pergola, internal trims, and water tanks' 'Assessment of damages and whether costs for preliminaries, overheads and profit should be included']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd breached contract and statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989. The owners were entitled to recover damages for rectification of defects in the pergola, internal trims, and water storage tanks according to preferred rectification methodologies, including appropriate allowances for preliminaries, overheads, profit and GST. Less costly repair options offered by the builder were rejected as insufficient to restore contractual conformity.
Court Disposition
judgment for applicants
Orders
- ['Mick Fabar Constructions Pty Ltd must pay Robert Symes and Kim Louise Filmer the sum of $99,304.71 within 14 days of the date of this order.' 'Either party may make a costs application pursuant to section 53 of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 or regulation 20 of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment