Waterhouse v Racing Appeals Tribunal [2002] NSWSC 1040

Waterhouse v Racing Appeals Tribunal [2002] NSWSC 1040

Although the case is borderline, it is appropriate to stay the plaintiff's disqualification until judgment is delivered, provided the plaintiff undertakes to treat himself as suspended, based on the Court's inherent jurisdiction and the particular circumstances affecting minimal prejudice to the defendant and the weight of issues raised.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 October 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaratory or Prerogative Relief / Interlocutory Hearing on Stay Application
Outcome
Stay granted
Legal Topics
['inherent Power of Court' 'stay of Tribunal Decision' 'supervisory Jurisdiction' 'relief Pending Appeal']
['administrative Law' 'judicial Review'] ['inherent Power of Court' 'stay of Tribunal Decision' 'supervisory Jurisdiction' 'relief Pending Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Declaratory or Prerogative Relief / Interlocutory Hearing on Stay Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the court should grant a stay of the Tribunal's order of disqualification pending judgment" 'Scope and basis for the exercise of inherent jurisdiction to grant a stay in supervisory review of inferior tribunal decisions']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the case is borderline, it is appropriate to stay the plaintiff's disqualification until judgment is delivered, provided the plaintiff undertakes to treat himself as suspended, based on the Court's inherent jurisdiction and the particular circumstances affecting minimal prejudice to the defendant and the weight of issues raised.

Court Disposition

Stay granted

Orders

  • ["Stay of plaintiff's disqualification by the Tribunal is granted until delivery of judgment, on the basis that the plaintiff undertakes to treat himself as suspended under the order of the Panel."]