Robey Mascot Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2019] NSWLEC 1561
As the agreement reached between the parties at the conciliation conference is a decision the Court could have made under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 have been satisfied, the appeal is upheld with orders made in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference – Final Determination
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference – Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conditions of consent (conditions 68(c), 68(d), and 114(c)) should be deleted and alternate conditions inserted pursuant to s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for the Court to modify the development consent are met under s 4.55(1A) of the EPA Act' 'Whether the agreement between the parties at the conciliation conference can be adopted under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
As the agreement reached between the parties at the conciliation conference is a decision the Court could have made under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 have been satisfied, the appeal is upheld with orders made in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Modification Application No. BDA-2016/165/A to modify the development consent to DA2016/165 is approved as set out at Annexure "A".' 'Development Consent 2016/165 is now subject to the consolidated modified conditions of development consent set out in Annexure "B".']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment