Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 31
The notification letter stated clearly, under appropriate headings, the time in which an application for review may be made, satisfying the requirement in s 66(2)(d)(ii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth); therefore, the Tribunal was correct in finding it had no jurisdiction due to the application being made out of time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court, Considering Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'notification Requirements' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'application Time Limits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court, Considering Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the notification letter stated the time in which an application for review may be made as required by Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 66(2)(d)(ii)' 'Whether Tribunal had jurisdiction to review application made out of time' 'Whether clarity requirement of notification letter was satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
The notification letter stated clearly, under appropriate headings, the time in which an application for review may be made, satisfying the requirement in s 66(2)(d)(ii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth); therefore, the Tribunal was correct in finding it had no jurisdiction due to the application being made out of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment