Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 31

Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 31

The notification letter stated clearly, under appropriate headings, the time in which an application for review may be made, satisfying the requirement in s 66(2)(d)(ii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth); therefore, the Tribunal was correct in finding it had no jurisdiction due to the application being made out of time.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court, Considering Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'notification Requirements' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'application Time Limits']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court, Considering Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review

  1. 1 ['Whether the notification letter stated the time in which an application for review may be made as required by Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 66(2)(d)(ii)' 'Whether Tribunal had jurisdiction to review application made out of time' 'Whether clarity requirement of notification letter was satisfied']

Ratio Decidendi

The notification letter stated clearly, under appropriate headings, the time in which an application for review may be made, satisfying the requirement in s 66(2)(d)(ii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth); therefore, the Tribunal was correct in finding it had no jurisdiction due to the application being made out of time.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed."]