Robust Software v Mann Judd Reis Pty Limited [1997] FCA 1595

Robust Software v Mann Judd Reis Pty Limited [1997] FCA 1595

Security for costs was warranted because the applicant met the statutory threshold of likely inability to pay costs, the litigation was being conducted for the benefit of creditors and interests behind the applicant who stood to gain substantially and appeared able to provide security, the claim sought substantial consequential losses of about $2.7 million, an order was not likely to stifle the litigation, and the proceeding involved serious contested allegations including fraud.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 February 1997
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application for security for costs granted.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'corporate Applicant Unable to Pay Costs' 'discretion to Order Security' 'alleged Misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'fraud Allegations']
['civil Procedure' 'corporations' 'trade Practices'] ['security for Costs' 'corporate Applicant Unable to Pay Costs' 'discretion to Order Security' 'alleged Misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'fraud Allegations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against the applicant.' 'What amount of security for costs should be ordered.']

Ratio Decidendi

Security for costs was warranted because the applicant met the statutory threshold of likely inability to pay costs, the litigation was being conducted for the benefit of creditors and interests behind the applicant who stood to gain substantially and appeared able to provide security, the claim sought substantial consequential losses of about $2.7 million, an order was not likely to stifle the litigation, and the proceeding involved serious contested allegations including fraud.

Court Disposition

Application for security for costs granted.

Orders

  • ['The applicant is to provide security for costs in the sum of $30,000.']