de Gail v Lambert [2014] NSWLEC 180

de Gail v Lambert [2014] NSWLEC 180

The council complied with the terms specified under s 25B as set out in prior consent orders; the suspended part of the development consent relating to window W10 was validly re-granted with new privacy conditions after proper re-notification and consideration, enabling the Court to revoke suspension and declare validity under s 25C.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Post Suspension Orders; Determination of Validity and Mediation of Costs
Outcome
Court declared compliance with terms, revoked suspension, declared the suspended part validly re-granted and reserved costs; costs to be mediated.
Legal Topics
['validation of Development Consent' 'conditional Validity' 'notification Requirements' 'privacy Impacts' 'costs Mediation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Post Suspension Orders; Determination of Validity and Mediation of Costs

  1. 1 ['Whether development consent was validly re-granted after suspension and compliance with notification terms' 'Whether proper notification occurred regarding amended plans affecting window W10' 'Appropriate procedures for costs resolution']

Ratio Decidendi

The council complied with the terms specified under s 25B as set out in prior consent orders; the suspended part of the development consent relating to window W10 was validly re-granted with new privacy conditions after proper re-notification and consideration, enabling the Court to revoke suspension and declare validity under s 25C.

Court Disposition

Court declared compliance with terms, revoked suspension, declared the suspended part validly re-granted and reserved costs; costs to be mediated.

Orders

  • ['Terms under s 25B Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as per previous consent orders complied with' 'That part of development consent suspended is revoked' 'That part of development consent relating to window W10 validly re-granted' "Court's suspension order revoked" 'Costs reserved' 'Question of costs set down...