Evans v Mullumbimby News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 240
Leave under s 440D was not required for the plaintiffs to file the originating process so far as it sought a winding up order and appointment of a provisional liquidator, because s 440A specifically governs winding up proceedings during voluntary administration. However, the additional claims for access to documents, co-operation and restraint against the company were proceedings against the company within s 440D and could not be included without leave; the originating process could therefore be filed only in amended form limiting those claims to the second defendant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Proceeding Concerning Proposed Winding Up of Company Under Voluntary Administration / Application for Leave to File Originating Process
- Outcome
- Leave to file originating process in amended form
- Legal Topics
- ['voluntary Administration' 'winding Up Proceedings' 'leave Under S 440 D' 'provisional Liquidator' 'access to Company Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Proceeding Concerning Proposed Winding Up of Company Under Voluntary Administration / Application for Leave to File Originating Process
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave under s 440D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) was needed to file an originating process seeking a winding up order against a company under voluntary administration.' 'Whether the plaintiffs could include claims for access to documents, co-operation and interlocutory restraint against the company without leave under s 440D.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave under s 440D was not required for the plaintiffs to file the originating process so far as it sought a winding up order and appointment of a provisional liquidator, because s 440A specifically governs winding up proceedings during voluntary administration. However, the additional claims for access to documents, co-operation and restraint against the company were proceedings against the company within s 440D and could not be included without leave; the originating process could therefore be filed only in amended form limiting those claims to the second defendant.
Court Disposition
Leave to file originating process in amended form
Orders
- ['Leave granted to the plaintiffs to file an originating process in the form initialled and dated by the Court but modified so that in each of paras 3, 4 and 7 the words "first and second defendants" are replaced by the words "second defendant" and in paragraph 5 the word "defendants" is replaced by the words...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment