Robyn Taylor Child Development & Educational Centres Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1387
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and make orders upholding the appeal and granting the modification approval.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal Concerning a Modification Application / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification application approved; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'modification of Development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'childcare Centre Capacity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal Concerning a Modification Application / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' 'Whether modification application No 10.2011.37.2 should be approved to modify development consent number 10.2011.37.1 to increase the childcare centre capacity at 65 Church Street, Croydon from 52 children to 60 children at any one time.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and make orders upholding the appeal and granting the modification approval.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification application approved; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Approval is granted to modification application No 10.2011.37.2 to modify development consent number 10.2011.37.1 to increase the capacity of the childcare centre at 65 Church Street, Croydon from 52 children to 60 children at any one time, and the consent is now subject to the consolidated...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment