TILLOTT v TILLOTT [1991] NSWCA 266
The trial judge's awards for pre-trial general damages for pain and suffering and loss of economic opportunity were below the sound discretionary range warranted by the evidence; interest on pre-trial non-economic loss should be assessed at 4% per annum following MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic. The appellate court accordingly substituted higher awards for both heads of damage and re-calculated interest in accordance with the stated principles.
- Parties
- Appellant: Robyn Tillott; Respondent: Mr Tillott
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment below set aside; substituted judgment for appellant in the sum of $268,986 as at 8 February 1989; respondent to pay appellant's costs of appeal; respondent to have certificate under Suitors' Fund Act if entitled
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Motor Vehicle Accident, Quantum, Loss of Economic Opportunity, Interest on Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robyn Tillott
Appellant
Mr Tillott
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the award for pre-trial general damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities was below a sound discretionary judgment
- 2 Whether the award for loss of economic opportunity was inadequate
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in calculation or awarding of interest
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's awards for pre-trial general damages for pain and suffering and loss of economic opportunity were below the sound discretionary range warranted by the evidence; interest on pre-trial non-economic loss should be assessed at 4% per annum following MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic. The appellate court accordingly substituted higher awards for both heads of damage and re-calculated interest in accordance with the stated principles.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment below set aside; substituted judgment for appellant in the sum of $268,986 as at 8 February 1989; respondent to pay appellant's costs of appeal; respondent to have certificate under Suitors' Fund Act if entitled
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Judgment in District Court set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment