R v Rasmussen [2021] NSWDC 620
The aggregate sentence imposed by the Local Court was not manifestly excessive. While Bugmy principles mitigate to some extent due to the appellant's disadvantage and Indigenous status, the seriousness, repeated nature, and recidivism of the offending require that general deterrence and community protection predominate. No error is demonstrated in the exercise of sentencing discretion or in the length of the aggregate sentence. The severity appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Severity Appeal / Sentence Appeal From Local Court to District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'severity Appeal' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'driving Offences' 'larceny' 'recidivism' 'mitigation' 'bugmy Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Severity Appeal / Sentence Appeal From Local Court to District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the aggregate sentence imposed by the Local Court was manifestly excessive' 'Application of Bugmy principles to mitigate sentence due to childhood disadvantage and Indigenous status' 'Consideration of offender’s mental health and drug issues in sentencing' 'Appropriateness of individual and total sentences for multiple offences, including recidivist driving and dishonesty offences']
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed by the Local Court was not manifestly excessive. While Bugmy principles mitigate to some extent due to the appellant's disadvantage and Indigenous status, the seriousness, repeated nature, and recidivism of the offending require that general deterrence and community protection predominate. No error is demonstrated in the exercise of sentencing discretion or in the length of the aggregate sentence. The severity appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Severity appeal is dismissed' 'Aggregate sentence of 2 years and 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 months, confirmed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment