Rochfort v Trade Practices Commission [1982] HCA 66

Rochfort v Trade Practices Commission [1982] HCA 66

The appellant, as executive director and officer entrusted with the immediate physical custody and effective control of the documents of the unincorporated association, was obliged to produce them in response to the subpoena, regardless of the absence of express authority from those associations or the employer; privilege against self-incrimination did not operate to prevent production since it is personal to the witness, not to associations.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['production of Documents' 'subpoena Duces Tecum' 'employee Possession' 'unincorporated Associations' 'privilege Against Self Incrimination']
['evidence' 'civil Procedure'] ['production of Documents' 'subpoena Duces Tecum' 'employee Possession' 'unincorporated Associations' 'privilege Against Self Incrimination']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What degree of possession, custody or control of documents is required for compliance with a subpoena duces tecum?' 'Is an employee obligated to produce documents held for their employer or an unincorporated association?' 'Is privilege against self-incrimination available to artificial persons or associations?']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, as executive director and officer entrusted with the immediate physical custody and effective control of the documents of the unincorporated association, was obliged to produce them in response to the subpoena, regardless of the absence of express authority from those associations or the employer; privilege against self-incrimination did not operate to prevent production since it is personal to the witness, not to associations.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']