SafeWork NSW v Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] NSWDC 250

SafeWork NSW v Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] NSWDC 250

Although the risk causing death was not foreseen by Rockfield or generally known in the industry, the risk was foreseeable in a general sense, the harm was severe, and mitigation steps would have been straightforward; the level of culpability was determined to be low, resulting in conviction, a fine, costs orders, and a work health and safety education project order as the appropriate penalty.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 June 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction and sentence imposed on Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd
Legal Topics
['prosecution' 'work Health and Safety' 'duty of Persons Undertaking Business' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'sentencing' 'mitigating Factors' 'aggravating Factors' 'plea of Guilty' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'capacity to Pay' 'work Health and Safety Project Order' 'prosecution Costs']
['criminal Law' 'work Health and Safety'] ['prosecution' 'work Health and Safety' 'duty of Persons Undertaking Business' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'sentencing' 'mitigating Factors' 'aggravating Factors' 'plea of Guilty' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'capacity to Pay' 'work Health and Safety Project Order' 'prosecution Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd failed in its work health and safety duty under s 19 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)' 'Assessment of the objective seriousness of the offence and culpability of Rockfield' 'Appropriate penalty in light of aggravating and mitigating factors']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the risk causing death was not foreseen by Rockfield or generally known in the industry, the risk was foreseeable in a general sense, the harm was severe, and mitigation steps would have been straightforward; the level of culpability was determined to be low, resulting in conviction, a fine, costs orders, and a work health and safety education project order as the appropriate penalty.

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence imposed on Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd

Orders

  • ['Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd is convicted.' 'Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $250,000.' 'Pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996, 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.' "Rockfield Contracting Pty Ltd to pay the prosecutor's costs." 'Order under s 238 of the Work Health and...