Ellis v TAL Life Ltd [2019] NSWDC 259
The benign brain tumour suffered by the plaintiff was of a character to be life threatening within the meaning of the policy, and the threshold of 25% whole person impairment was met by considering both physical and psychiatric impairments; thus, the plaintiff was entitled to the policy benefit.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rodney Graeme Ellis; Defendant: TAL Life Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Verdict and Judgment
- Outcome
- Verdict and judgment for the Plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Medical Catastrophe Benefit, Interpretation of Insurance Policy, Whole Person Impairment, Benign Brain Tumour
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodney Graeme Ellis
Plaintiff
TAL Life Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Verdict and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's tumour meets the definition of 'benign brain tumour' under the policy
- 2 Whether assessment of whole person impairment includes both physical and psychiatric conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The benign brain tumour suffered by the plaintiff was of a character to be life threatening within the meaning of the policy, and the threshold of 25% whole person impairment was met by considering both physical and psychiatric impairments; thus, the plaintiff was entitled to the policy benefit.
Court Disposition
Verdict and judgment for the Plaintiff
Orders
- Verdict and judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $280,254
- Court will hear from the parties as to interest calculated pursuant to s 57 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment