Rodonna Properties Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 259
Despite the proposal's general compliance with the statutory controls and suitability in detached form, design details relating to courtyard amenity, location of visitor parking, hard paved areas, and general site planning are unsatisfactory and justify refusal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rodonna Properties Pty Ltd; Respondent: Wollondilly Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Development Control Plan, Subdivision, Strata Title, Local Environmental Plan, Medium Density Housing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodonna Properties Pty Ltd
Applicant
Wollondilly Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposal is compatible with the character of the locality
- 2 Whether the proposed dwellings offer satisfactory amenity, particularly private courtyards
- 3 Whether the arrangement of the development on the site is satisfactory including car parking, common open space, and planning
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the proposal's general compliance with the statutory controls and suitability in detached form, design details relating to courtyard amenity, location of visitor parking, hard paved areas, and general site planning are unsatisfactory and justify refusal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Development application No. 1718/02 for the demolition of an existing dwelling, the construction of twelve single-storey three-bedroom dwellings and the strata subdivision of the resulting medium density units, on part of lots 1 and 2 in DP 625492 being land at Nos. 19 and 21 Victoria Road, Thirlmere, is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment