Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 9) [2017] NSWSC 1116
The court granted leave for the plaintiff to file a Fifth Amended Statement of Claim containing amendments relating to updated expert evidence and new simulations because these amendments and evidence were of fundamental importance to the plaintiff's case, and it would be unjust to require the plaintiff to proceed on now-disavowed expert opinions. The court found the delay was due to neglect but, balancing the prejudice to the defendants and the significance to the plaintiff, allowed the amendments and expert report on the condition that the plaintiff pay costs thrown away, and specific alternative/contingent pleadings that reserved unfettered rights were disallowed to ensure procedural...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceedings / Interlocutory Application to Amend Statement of Claim and for Leave to Rely on Further Expert Evidence
- Outcome
- Leave to amend statement of claim and rely on further expert report granted in part; costs thrown away to be paid by plaintiff; application otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'expert Evidence' 'representative Proceedings' 'flood Liability' 'civil Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceedings / Interlocutory Application to Amend Statement of Claim and for Leave to Rely on Further Expert Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the statement of claim to include further particulars and simulations arising from an updated expert report' 'Whether leave should be granted to rely on further expert evidence, including new simulations' 'Whether certain forms of alternative or contingent pleading should be permitted' 'The appropriate form of amendment to ensure procedural fairness to defendants']
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted leave for the plaintiff to file a Fifth Amended Statement of Claim containing amendments relating to updated expert evidence and new simulations because these amendments and evidence were of fundamental importance to the plaintiff's case, and it would be unjust to require the plaintiff to proceed on now-disavowed expert opinions. The court found the delay was due to neglect but, balancing the prejudice to the defendants and the significance to the plaintiff, allowed the amendments and expert report on the condition that the plaintiff pay costs thrown away, and specific alternative/contingent pleadings that reserved unfettered rights were disallowed to ensure procedural...
Court Disposition
Leave to amend statement of claim and rely on further expert report granted in part; costs thrown away to be paid by plaintiff; application otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff be granted leave to file a Fifth Amended Statement of Claim containing the amendments set out in Annexure A and Annexure B.' 'Refuse the plaintiff leave to make the amendments set out in Annexure C.' "Otherwise dismiss prayer 1 of the plaintiff's notice of motion filed 21 July 2017." 'Dispense with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment