Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 1279
Given the size and complexity of the litigation, and that the confidential and commercially valuable intellectual property (DSS-WISE system) is owned by a third party overseas, it is appropriate to condition discovery of the model and data on a written undertaking, but only in terms commensurate with the implied undertaking; the proposed plaintiff's undertaking was too broad and would create impermissible substantive obligations.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority (t/as Seqwater); Second Defendant: Sun Water Limited; Third Defendant: State of Queensland
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Interlocutory Application; Discovery/production Order Conditions
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Confidentiality Undertakings, Use of Expert Evidence, Intellectual Property in Litigation, Interlocutory Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority (t/as Seqwater)
First Defendant
Sun Water Limited
Second Defendant
State of Queensland
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Interlocutory Application; Discovery/production Order Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order for production of hydraulic model software and data should be subject to a written confidentiality undertaking
- 2 Whether the implied undertaking (Harman rule) is sufficient protection for confidential material produced in discovery
- 3 Appropriate form/terms of confidentiality undertakings for discovered material owned by third parties
Ratio Decidendi
Given the size and complexity of the litigation, and that the confidential and commercially valuable intellectual property (DSS-WISE system) is owned by a third party overseas, it is appropriate to condition discovery of the model and data on a written undertaking, but only in terms commensurate with the implied undertaking; the proposed plaintiff's undertaking was too broad and would create impermissible substantive obligations.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Order 3 of 26 June 2016 set aside.
- On or before 16 September 2016, the plaintiff to provide to each defendant (that provides the required written undertaking to the Court) (a) a standalone copy of the DSS-WISE software used by Dr Altinakar for the reports, in a form able to be used in Australia, and (b) all necessary input files to reproduce model...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment