Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 28) [2021] NSWSC 467
It is appropriate to approve the partial settlement between the plaintiff/group members and SunWater/State of Queensland as it represents a fair and reasonable compromise in light of the risks, complexity, likely costs, and uncertainties of the litigation and on the evidence as to fairness to group members. Suppression/non-publication orders are warranted, being necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice in ongoing or future proceedings with the non-settling defendant, and orders limited to 'until further order' are adequate given the court’s ongoing supervision of the matter.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater; Second Defendant: SunWater Ltd; Third Defendant: State of Queensland; Funder: Omni Bridgeway Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceedings (class Action) / Application for Approval of Partial Settlement; Consequential and Suppression/non Publication Orders
- Outcome
- Settlement between group members and SunWater/State of Queensland approved; suppression/non-publication orders granted; consequential orders made as per terms set out in the reasons and orders.
- Legal Topics
- Representative Proceedings, Settlement Approval, Suppression and Non Publication Orders, Negligence, Flood Damages, Costs and Funding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater
First Defendant
SunWater Ltd
Second Defendant
State of Queensland
Third Defendant
Omni Bridgeway Ltd
Funder
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceedings (class Action) / Application for Approval of Partial Settlement; Consequential and Suppression/non Publication Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the partial settlement between group members and SunWater/State of Queensland should be approved under s 173 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
- 2 Whether non-publication orders are necessary and appropriate under the Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
It is appropriate to approve the partial settlement between the plaintiff/group members and SunWater/State of Queensland as it represents a fair and reasonable compromise in light of the risks, complexity, likely costs, and uncertainties of the litigation and on the evidence as to fairness to group members. Suppression/non-publication orders are warranted, being necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice in ongoing or future proceedings with the non-settling defendant, and orders limited to 'until further order' are adequate given the court’s ongoing supervision of the matter.
Court Disposition
Settlement between group members and SunWater/State of Queensland approved; suppression/non-publication orders granted; consequential orders made as per terms set out in the reasons and orders.
Orders
- Confidential evidence and submissions relating to settlement approval to be subject to non-publication (suppression) orders until further order, with specific exceptions for specified persons/entities.
- Settlement between group members and SunWater/State of Queensland approved pursuant to Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 173; settlement terms as per confidential deed/scheme affirmed in evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment