Regina v R Yates [1999] NSWCCA 403
A shorter minimum term is not warranted in light of the objective criminality of the offence and the requirements of general deterrence; appeal against sentence should be dismissed.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Rogan Yates
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Supply of Prohibited Drugs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Rogan Yates
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to find special circumstances pursuant to s 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 1989
- 2 Whether the minimum term imposed was excessive and failed to reflect the subjective features of the case
Ratio Decidendi
A shorter minimum term is not warranted in light of the objective criminality of the offence and the requirements of general deterrence; appeal against sentence should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment