Withers v Tumut Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 55
Because the parties reached agreement during the on-site hearing, with condition 8 remaining and condition 5 replaced by an agreed condition concerning the location of the security fence and protective cover, the appeal was upheld by consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of a S96 Application to Delete Condition 5 and Defer Condition 8 of Development Consent 2003/04 197 / On Site Hearing; Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 's96 Application' 'modification of Consent Conditions' 'security Fencing' 'on Site Hydrant']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of a S96 Application to Delete Condition 5 and Defer Condition 8 of Development Consent 2003/04 197 / On Site Hearing; Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether condition 5 of Development Consent 2003/04-197 should be deleted and replaced with an amended security fencing condition.' 'Whether condition 8 of Development Consent 2003/04-197 should be deferred.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement during the on-site hearing, with condition 8 remaining and condition 5 replaced by an agreed condition concerning the location of the security fence and protective cover, the appeal was upheld by consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Condition 5 of Development Consent 2003/04-197 is deleted and the following condition is inserted in its place: "Adopting the Snowy Mountains Highway as the east-west axis, the security fence is to be located at a distance of 5m from the boundary to a point where that line intersects with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment