Daou v Bankstown City Council [2006] NSWLEC 820
The proposal meets all objectives of the minimum frontage standard; the non-compliance is minor and the site accommodates the development with no unacceptable impacts on density, amenity, or character, and approval would not create an unwarranted precedent.
- Parties
- Applicant: Roger Daou trading as Daou Designs and Developments; Respondent: Bankstown City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, SEPP 1 Objection, Minimum Frontage, Dual Occupancy, Subdivision, Residential Zoning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roger Daou trading as Daou Designs and Developments
Applicant
Bankstown City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 whether non-compliance with the minimum frontage is acceptable and the SEPP 1 objection is well founded
- 2 whether the proposal will be a precedent for other development
- 3 whether the proposal has an acceptable bulk and scale impact on the existing and future character of the area
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal meets all objectives of the minimum frontage standard; the non-compliance is minor and the site accommodates the development with no unacceptable impacts on density, amenity, or character, and approval would not create an unwarranted precedent.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The development application (1226/2006) for the demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of an attached dual occupancy and front fence with Torrens Title subdivision at 5 Omega Place, Greenacre, is approved subject to conditions in annexure 'A'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment